Whitehouse.gov
USAFRICA UNITED HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
The
history of justice is the historical current studying justice, its
practices, its influences and its evolutions in past societies.
According to the theories of the social contract, there can be no
civilization without rights.The first civilizations date from
prehistoric times, and more precisely from the Neolithic era with the
appearance of agriculture and breeding.
We can therefore deduce that the
first rights were developed during this period. Human groups are getting
closer for the old villages, rules of community life (or rights) must
have been drawn up to determine the sharing of harvests and to punish
the first criminals. However, this is only a hypothesis because there is
no longer any witness or trace (writing not yet having been invented).
And the court is any person or
institution, often as a government institution, with the authority to
adjudicate legal disputes between parties and carry out the
administration of justice in civil, criminal, and administrative matters
in accordance with the rule of law.[1] In both common law and civil law
legal systems, courts are the central means for dispute resolution, and
it is generally understood that all people have an ability to bring
their claims before a court. Similarly, the rights of those accused of a
crime include the right to present a defense before a court. The
system of courts that interprets and applies the law is collectively
known as the judiciary. The place where a court sits is known as a
venue.The room where court proceedings occur is known as a courtroom,
and the building as a courthouse; court facilities range from simple and
very small facilities in rural communities to large buildings in
cities.
The practical authority given to the court is known as its
jurisdiction (from Latin iūrisdictiō, from iūris, "of the law," + dīcō,
"to declare," + -tiō, noun-forming suffix), the court's power to decide
certain kinds of questions or petitions put to it. According to William
Blackstone's Commentaries on the Laws of England, a court (for civil
wrongs) is constituted by a minimum of three parties: the āctor or
plaintiff, who complains of an injury done; the reus or defendant, who
is called upon to make satisfaction for it; and the jūdex or judicial
power, who is to examine the truth of the fact, determine the law
arising upon that fact, and, if any injury appears to have been done,
ascertain and by its officers apply a legal remedy.
It is also usual in
the superior courts to have barristers, and attorneys or counsel, as
assistants,[2] though, often, courts consist of additional barristers,
bailiffs, reporters, and perhaps a jury. The term "the court" is also
used to refer to the presiding officer or officials, usually one or more
judges. The judge or panel of judges may also be collectively referred
to as "the bench" (in contrast to attorneys and barristers, collectively
referred to as "the bar").[3] In the United States, the legal
authority of a court to take action is based on personal jurisdiction
over the parties to the litigation and subject-matter jurisdiction over
the claims asserted.
Today, we are building the USAfrica United High Court of Justice for to
judge international crimes or misdemeanors committed by heads of state and
Authorities ( Officiers Marshal & Generaux and Civil servant or officer vested with judicial, administrative or political authority ) who are
Heads & members authorities of the each Africans 54 State &
Government and other Inter Government members of the African UnitedGov
in the exercise of their functions and for acts committed
outside their functions, the traditional common law courts are
competent.
And
there is building for supports estabilise this United Nation Coucil Resolution
Authorization and President United States
Constitutional Authority power to protect and defend the constitution
and to conduct inter millitary Operation against terrorists and Nation
& Organization supporting them and for to judge all the event action terrorism with
extremism violence killed and prevention extremism violence terrorism have target to
kill President United States and Africans President State and Inter Government members of the African UnitedGov with other
crimes genocide extremism violence not respect the world human rights massacre Africans
and other world unarmed civilians, and the USAfrica United High Court of Justice is the first responsible on the last reason and decisiveness
authorization only of can for suspended the International pursuit judicial and enforcement the Code & Law Criminal with other of need for defeat & against and convicting the real culprits on this moments of
Africans and other inter action inssurection and rebellions.
And
this USAfrica United High Court of Justice is have President Chief in Command
with all other Heads of Court Justice members from this International
High
Court Jutice & Inter Supreme Court of Jutice view on this next
list:
The
USAfrica United High Court of Justice is under presided and itself of the US.
Constitution and UN. Coucil Resolution Authorization with all other charte and
Statut Judicials private of the each seven (7) Inter Court of Justice & Inter
Supreme Court members of the USAfrica United Court of Justice and
every time the UHCJ is have collaboration,
cooperation and partisciple with for everyone Inter Court of Justice and Inter Supreme Court with all other each Africans 54 State and
Government and Court of Justice and Defense already build and building
in all region of territoies of the United States of Africa Nation on
moments of need for process execute this all International Judgement of
High Court of Justice from the USAfrica United High Court of Justice.
Contact :
Phone : +261340261111
Email : judicials2@yahoo.com
Twitter : https://twitter.com/UsafricaJ
